Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1311 (CAL)

ISHITA SAHOO @ PANDIT v. ANANDA PANDIT

CRR/432/2026 · 2026-03-18

Dinesh Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

18.03.2026 Sl. no. 62 Ct. No. 42 P.M. CRR 432 OF 2026 Ishita Sahoo @ Pandit - Vs – Ananda Pandit Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay, Ms. Rajashree Tah, Ms. Trisha Rakshit, Ms. Aishwarya Datta, Ms. Sadia Parveen, Ms. Bidisha Chakraborty ... for the petitioner Mr. Amit Ranjan Pati, Ms. Swastika Chowdhury, Mr. Khadijatul Kubra, Mr. Avijit Chatterjee, Ms. Ilika Nag, Mr. Sourav Gupta ... for the opposite party. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. 2. Liberty is granted. 3. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, duly applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all usual requisite formalities. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)