ADITYA BIRLA FASHION AND RETAIL LIMITED v. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
CRL.M.C./5099/2026 · 2026-07-22
Manoj Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13105 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13105 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL.M.C. 5099/2026 1
$~94 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5099/2026 & CRL.M.A. 21407/2026
ADITYA BIRLA FASHION AND RETAIL LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Sharma, Ms. Ayushi Sharma, Mr. Jayant Dayal, Mr. Aryan Shokeen and Mr. Aryan Rana, Advocates.
versus
STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for the State with SI Ankit Sharma.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R %
22.07.2026
1. Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 30.05.2026 whereby respondent No.2 herein has been granted anticipatory bail.
2. His sole contention is to the effect that he was never informed about the abovesaid application by the prosecution and that the bail has been granted without giving him any opportunity of being heard.
3. However, after some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present application. He, however, prays that it be clarified that observations given in the impugned order are only tentative in nature and would not prejudice the case of the complainant during the trial. He supplements that there was a tacit understanding between the husband and wife, and a hefty amount of more than Rs.60 lacs was transferred in her This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2026 at 11:31:41
CRL.M.C. 5099/2026 2
account and the wife, all along, was aware about the misdeeds of her husband and, therefore, she was also a willing partner in the crime.
4. Undeniably, the observations, mentioned in bail order, cannot be taken as final expression over the merits and things would become clearer, only after the trial commences.
5. The application is, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed with the clarification that observations made in the impugned order would be treated as tentative in nature and would not cause any prejudice to the rights and
contentions of the appellant.
MANOJ JAIN, J JULY 22, 2026/ss/pb This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2026 at 11:31:41