Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13102 (DEL)

MOHD SHAMIM ANSARI v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

W.P.(CRL)/2160/2026 · 2026-07-24

Girish Kathpalia

Writ Petition (Criminal)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(CRL) 2160/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 24.07.2026 + W.P.(CRL) 2160/2026, CRL.M.A. 21635/2026 & CRL.M.A. 21634/2026 MOHD SHAMIM ANSARI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamran Malik and Mr. Javed Hasan, Advocates versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for the State with SI Achal CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks writ to the State for providing him police protection as he apprehends harm at the hands of his brother, respondent no.2. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner had civil dispute with respondent no. 2, which dispute got settled, but respondent no. 2 has started threatening the petitioner. 3. Learned ASC assisted by SI Achal accepts notice and submits that the complaint filed by the petitioner is under inquiry as it is a matter of two GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4556 9af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155709 96b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.07.24 17:02:44 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:24.07.2026 17:15:54 Signature Not Verified W.P.(CRL) 2160/2026 Page 2 of 2 pages brothers in dispute. 4. However, learned ASC has provided mobile phone number of the Beat Constable concerned to learned counsel for petitioner so that petitioner may call up the Beat Constable at the time of distress. 5. That satisfies the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petition and the accompanying applications are disposed of directing the local police to respond to the calls of the petitioner at the time of distress and ensure that he is not harmed by respondent no. 2 in any manner. 7. It is made clear that this order shall not be read as believing the allegations of petitioner against respondent no. 2. GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) JULY 24, 2026 ‘rs’ GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569a f3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996 b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.07.24 17:02:27 +05'30' By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:24.07.2026 17:15:54