1 2026:CGHC:11882 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1331 of 2018 M/s Singhaniya Construction Com. Through Mohan Singhaniya, S/o Govind Prashad Singhaniya, Aged about 42 Years. R/o G-2 Champa Bhawan Sivaji Park Saddu Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. .............Owner Roller Engine. No. 232801 --- Appellant(s) versus 1 - Smt. Janki Devi W/o W/o Brihaspatiya Ram, Aged About 40 Years 2 - Brihaspatiya Ram S/o Bhagatram Manhar, Aged About 42 Years Both R/o Village Bannakdih, Post and Police Station- Sirgitti Tehsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ................ Non Applicants Claimants 3 - Surjeet Sahu S/o Bhau Ram Sahu, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village- Near Government School Ward No. 10, Palari Thana Palari District Balouda Bazar Chhattisgarh. ...............Driver Roller Engine No. 232801., District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) MAC No. 1308 of 2018 M/s Singhaniya Construction Com. Through Mohan Singhaniya S/o Govind Prashad Singhaniya, Aged about 42 years, R/o G-2 Champa Bhawan, Sivaji Park Saddu Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---Appellant(s) SHYNA AJAY Digitally signed by SHYNA AJAY DN: cn=SHYNA AJAY, o=PERSONAL, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN 2 Versus 1 - Smt. Laxmin Bai W/o Babulal Bharti, Aged About 50 Years 2 - Babulal Bharti S/o Late Nakched Bharti, Aged About 55 Years Both R/o Village Bannakdih, Post and Police Station Sirgitti Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh CLAIMANTS 3 - Surjeet Sahu, aged about 40 years, S/o Bhau Ram Sahu R/o Village Near Government School Ward No. 10, Palari P.S. Palari, District Baloda Bazar Chhattisgarh (Driver – Roller engine No.232801) --- Respondent(s) (Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : None SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 12/03/2026 1. Since none appears on behalf of the appellants, even when the matter was called out twice, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the Appeals for want of prosecution. 2. In view of the above, both the Appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Shyna Ajay 3 ({JUDGE_NAME}) JUDGE PSName