Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13100 (RAJ)

DEVILAL SON OF KANARAM GETHALA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13051/2026 · 2026-08-20

Chandra Shekhar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:33538] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13051/2026 CNR: RJHC020789542026 | URN: CRLMB / 24127U / 2026 Devilal Son Of Kanaram Gathala, Resident Of Holya Ka Bas, Police Station Thoi, District Sikar, Rajasthan (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Neem Ka Thana) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vidhut Kumar Gupta Ms. Manisha Solera For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP with Mr. Sapan Soni HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA Order 20/08/2026 The present bail application has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS (Old Section 439 Cr.P.C.) in connection with FIR No.45/2026 registered at Police Station Sri Madhopur, District Sikar for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 309(4), 331(6), 331(7), 324(5), 324(6), 119(1) and 351(3) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the matter. It is further submitted that co-accused Manish Kumar S/o Kajodmal has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court while deciding S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application [2026:RJ-JP:33538] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13051/2026] No.11714/2026 vide order dated 29.07.2026. Learned counsel submitted that case of the petitioner is not distinguishable from the case of the co-accused who has been granted bail. Lastly, learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner. 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS (Old Section 439 Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Devilal S/o Kanaram Gathala arrested in connection with FIR No.45/2026 registered at Police Station Sri Madhopur, District Sikar shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial Court, for his appearance before that Court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial. (CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA),J 89/TWINKLE SINGH