IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 10233 of 2026. Decided on: 25.6.2026. Ved Prakash .…Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents. …………………………………………………………………………………… Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Susheel Gautam, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge(Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents- State. 2. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is not interfering with the transfer order, but on the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of with the observation that after serving for some reasonable time at the transferred station, which shall not be less than six months, the petitioner is given liberty to approach the authority for his adjustment for some other station and if any such representation is filed by the petitioner after the joining to 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 the place, the same shall be considered by the Board sympathetically, of course, taking into consideration his tenure. In view of above, the instant petition is disposed of, so also pending miscellaneous applications, if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 25th June, 2026 (Guleria)