-1- 902-CA-10872-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10872 OF 2026 IN REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL)(ST) NO. 28326 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11649 OF 2026 NITIN DEVRAM SAKE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ..… Mr. Akshay Raosaheb Dhore, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondents – State. ..... CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATED : 22nd SEPTEMBER 2026 PER COURT : 1. The present application is filed seeking condonation of delay in filing the Review Application, wherein the Review Applicant impugns the order passed by this court on 27th November 2025 in Writ Petition No. 11649 of 2025. 2. In order to issue notices in the application for condonation of delay, we thought it is appropriate to weigh the merits of the Review Application. Learned Advocate for the Review Applicant invited our attention to the impugned order especially paragraph no. 3. He contends that the bank guarantee was never 2026:BHC-AUG:44106-DB -2- 902-CA-10872-2026 given and in spite of there being no policy or rule the amount has been deducted. 3. We have perused the order impugned. Paragraph no. 2 of the said order clearly infer that the inter se agreements between the parties were always a subject matter before accepting the employment. In paragraph 3, the Writ Petition was dismissed only on the ground that the issues which are raised in the Petition pertains to disputed question of fact which cannot be adjudicated in a writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. We do not find that there is any good ground for entertaining the Review Application itself, and therefore, we are not inclined to issue notices in the delay application. 5. The application stands dismissed. [HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] Tandale