Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13096 (PAT)

Jumedin @ Md. Jimedin v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./21477/2026 · 2026-04-29

Alok Kumar Sinha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21477 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2025 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== 1. Jumedin @ Md. Jimedin S/o Jumman Miyan @ Riyajuddin R/o Village - Madhura West, Ward No. 05, P.S - Narpatganj, District - Araria 2. Firaj @ Faiyaj @ Md. Faiyaj S/o Jumedin @ Md. Jimedin R/o Village - Madhura West, Ward No. 05, P.S - Narpatganj, District - Araria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gopal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 29-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of the BNS in connection with Narpatganj P.S.Case No. 375 of 2025. 3. As per allegation, the accused persons, including the petitioners, barged into the house of the informant and brutally assaulted the informant and her family members with various weapons. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21477 of 2026(2) dt.29-04-2026 2/2 petitioners are innocent and the entire allegation is false and fabricated. They have been dragged into this case due to land dispute. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the fact that there is direct allegation of assault against the petitioners on vital part of the body of the injured, which led to their grievous injuries, under these circumstances, I am not inclined to grant the petitioners the privilege of anticipatory bail, which is hereby rejected. HR/- (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) U T