APHC010567522022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Tuesday, the thirteenth day of October, Two thousand and twenty Six The Honourable Ms. Justice B. S. Bhanumathi Writ Petition (Transferred Between: R. Durga Satish, S/o. Venugoapal Swamy, Age: 27 years, Occ: Office Subordinate, O/o. The District Registrar of A Godavari district. and 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, through its Special Chief Secretary, Revenue (Regn Velagapudi. 2. The Director and Inspector General, Registration & Stamps, A.P., Edupugallu, Krishna District. 3. The Deputy Inspector General, Registration & Stamps, Eluru. 4. The District Registrar, Eluru. Counsel for the petitioner: 1. Amara Rama Rao Counsel for the respondents: 1. G.P. for Services - The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Tuesday, the thirteenth day of October, Two thousand and twenty Six Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B. S. Bhanumathi Writ Petition (Transferred from APAT) No.452 of 2022 (O.A. No. 197 of 2019) R. Durga Satish, S/o. Venugoapal Swamy, Age: 27 years, Occ: Office , O/o. The District Registrar of Assurances, Eluru, West ….Petitioner The State of Andhra Pradesh, through its Special Chief Revenue (Regn-I) Department, Secretariat Buildings, The Director and Inspector General, Registration & Stamps, A.P., Edupugallu, Krishna District. ctor General, Registration & Stamps, Eluru. The District Registrar, Eluru. ….Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Counsel for the respondents: I The Court made the following: [3311] Tuesday, the thirteenth day of October, Two thousand and twenty Six of 2022 R. Durga Satish, S/o. Venugoapal Swamy, Age: 27 years, Occ: Office surances, Eluru, West ….Petitioner The State of Andhra Pradesh, through its Special Chief I) Department, Secretariat Buildings, The Director and Inspector General, Registration & Stamps, A.P., ctor General, Registration & Stamps, Eluru. ….Respondents 2 BSB, J W.P (AT) No. 452 of 2022 ORDER: This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed with a prayer to set aside the Proceedings No.E1/343/2017-7, dated 02.02.2019, of the respondent No.4 reverting the applicant as Office Subordinate as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. 2. The learned Government Pleader for Services- I placed on record a copy of the written instructions of the District Registrar, vide Letter No. W.P. (AT) No.452/2022, dated 09.07.2026, wherein it was mentioned that the petitioner was promoted as Junior Assistant, and therefore, the grievance of the petitioner was resolved. A copy of the representation submitted by the petitioner to the District Registrar is enclosed to the written instructions, wherein it was stated that the petitioner got promoted and therefore, he is not interested in further prosecuting the writ petition. 3. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner submitted that there are no instructions from the petitioner despite the effort made to contact him over phone. 4. Since the writ petitioner is represented by the counsel, yet, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition, as it seems, and in view of the written instructions noted above, no further order is required. 5. As such, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to work out remedy, as per law, if he is still aggrieved. 3 BSB, J W.P (AT) No. 452 of 2022 There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ B.S. BHANUMATHI, J Dt.13-10-2026 RAR