Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13085 (AP)

J.R.V.Subba Rao v. The Divisional Electrical Engineer

WP/30813/2016 · 2026-10-06

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010088562016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 30813 OF 2016 Between: 1. J.R.V.Subba Rao,, S/o. Late Rama Rao, Hindu, aged about 55 years, Advocate, R/ o. 11/74, Jalduvari Street, Chemmanagiripet, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The Divisional Electrical Engineer, Constructions, APSPDCL, 1st Floor, 33 / 11 KV, Indoor Sub-Station, Musem Road, Governorpet, Vijayawada - 520 002, Krishna District. 2. The Superintending Engineer, Operation, APSPDCL., Grounds, Governorpet, Vijayawada - 520 002, Krishna District. 3. The Divisional Electrical Engineer, Operation Division, APSPDCL, Near Zilla Court, Machilipatnam, Krishna District - 521 001. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in proceeding with the erection of one pole in the midst of the petitioners land to an extent of Ac.2.15 cents situated in R.S.No. 359, Edepalli, Machavaram, 2 Machilipatnam, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents to forbear from erecting a pole in the petitioners land IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 38148 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forbear from erecting a pole in petitioners land to an extent of Ac.2.15 cents situated in R.S.No. 359, Edepalli, Machavaram, Machilipatnam, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: S SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondents: V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents:JAGARLAMUDI KOTESWARI DEVI The Court made the following order: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 30813 OF 2016 ORDER: Heard Sri T.Ravi Teja, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri T.Ravi Teja, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 07.10.2026 BSP 4 21 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 30813 OF 2016 07.10.2026 BSP