Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13084 (AP)

Ruka Vishnu Mohan Reddy v. Peddireddy Sanjeeva Reddy

AS/372/2026 · 2026-10-07

A Hari Haranadha Sarma, D Ramesh

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010294932026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3625] THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA APPEAL SUIT NO: 372/2026 Between: 1. RUKA VISHNU MOHAN REDDY, S/O R. CHINNAPU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, OF 2026 R/O ROOKAVANDLAPALLE VILLAGE, REDDYVARIPALLI POST, VEERABALLI MANDAL, ANNAMMAYYA DISTRICT. 2. SMT. REKA VENKATA SUJITHA, W/O RUKA VISHNU MOHAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O ROOKAVANDLAPALLE VILLAGE, REDDYVARIPALLI POST, VEERABALLI MANDAL, ANNAMMAYYA DISTRICT. 3. BADVEL AGNESAMMA, W/O B. SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS, R/O D.NO.4-39-1, GUPTA NAGAR, BADVEL TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ... ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. PEDDIREDDY SANJEEVA REDDY, S/O LATE P. NARASIMHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, LANDS, R/O D.NO.6-2-16, SUMITHRA NAGAR, BADVEL TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. PEDDIREDDY LAXSHMI NARAYANA REDDY, S/O LATE P. NARASIMHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O D.NO.7-1-626- 2-3, GANDHI NAGAR, SIDHOUT ROAD, BADVEL TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): pleased to set aside the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No. 63 of 2024 Dt. 10.12.2025, on the file of court of the VII Additional District Judge, Kadapa. by allowing this appeal with costs and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of 46 days in filing the appeal in the interests of justice and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Stay the operation and execution of the judgement and decree passed O.S.No.63 of 2024, dated 10.12.2025 on the file of the VII Additional District Judge, Kadapa pending disposal of the Appeal and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR and Dr. P.B Reddy Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T V S KUMAR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA APPEAL SUIT No.372 OF 2026 JUDGMENT : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D. Ramesh) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal to file an appropriate application before the concerned Court under Order IX, Rule 13, CPC, which may be considered by the concerned Court on its own merits. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, all miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the appeal shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH __________________________________ JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date:08.10.2026 Knr 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA APPEAL SUIT No.372 OF 2026 08.10.2026 Knr