- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10489-DB CCC No. 271 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 271 OF 2023 BETWEEN: MR. HANUME GOWDA S/O BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/A NO.708, BEHIND POLICE STATION BIDADI, RAMANAGARA-562109 PAN NO.-ADMPH4453P …COMPLAINANT (BY SMT. KAVITHA D., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. MR. MANJUNATH MAJOR S/O NOT KNOWN AUTHORIZED OFFICER M/S. THE BANGALOE CITY CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., OFFICE/AT NO.3, PAMPAMAHAKAVI ROAD CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU-560 018. 2. MR. APPAJAPPA S/O NOT KNOWN AGED MAJOR Digitally signed by RAKSHA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10489-DB CCC No. 271 of 2023 THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER M/S. THE BANGALORE CITY CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., ADMINISTRATIVE BRANCH OFFICE/AT NO.3, PAMPAMAHAKAVI ROAD CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU-560 018 3. MR. MADHUSUDAN S. N. S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA L AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/A NO.35, 1ST MAIN OPP.HONNAMMA CHOULTRY WARD NO.25, HANUMANTHANAGAR RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT 4. MR RAMANJANI S/O NOT KNOWN MAJOR THE BANK MANAGER M/S THE BANGALORE CITY CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., RAMANAGARA BRANCH NO.1363/2058, 1ST FLOOR OPP.BUS STAND B M ROAD, RAMANAGARA TOWN RAMANAGARA TOWN-562159 …ACCUSED THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO INITIATE APPROPRIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ALL THE ACCUSED PERSONS FOR WILLFULLY DISOBEYED THE JUDGMENT AND "STATUS QUO" DIRECTIONS PASSED BY THIS COURT IN WP NO.1751/2023 ON 10.2.2023 WAS IN FORCE WHICH IS EVIDENT VIDE DOCUMENT PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-B. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10489-DB CCC No. 271 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) The order dated 08.09.2023, learned counsel for the complainant has sought time. The matter is adjourned. 2. Today, there is no representation for the complainant. It appears that the learned counsel for the complainant is not interested to prosecute the petition. Accordingly, the Contempt of Court Case is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE RAK,List No.: 3 Sl No.: 25