Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13077 (KAR)

SRI. CHANDRAKUMARA P v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/14989/2024 · 2026-02-25

K V Aravind, S G Pandit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11826-DB WP No. 14989 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 14989 OF 2024 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: SRI. CHANDRAKUMARA P S/O M PARVATHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RETIRED ASSISTANT TREASURY OFFICER, R/AT A.M. KALLAIAH BADAVANE, LAKKAVANAHALLI ROAD, HIRIYUR TOWN, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577598. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BASANAGOUDA, ADV. FOR SRI VIRUPAKSHAIAH P. H., ADV.) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT (ADMINISTRATIVE AND ADVANCES) VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER TREASURY COMMISSIONERATE, 6TH FLOOR, KPTCL GREEN BUILDING, DRUGS CONTROL BUILDING PREMISES, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.R. RAJENDRA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2) Digitally signed by NANJUNDACHARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11826-DB WP No. 14989 of 2024 THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE SIMILAR NATURE QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 27.09.2023 IN A.NO.4275/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE KSAT BANGALORE HOLDING THE SAME IS ILLEGAL AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) For non-compliance of office objections, the above writ petition is listed for the 12th time. 2. Cost imposed while granting time to comply office objections on earlier occasions, has not been deposited and office objections are also not complied. 3. Learned counsel Sri. Basanagouda, appearing on behalf of learned counsel Sri. Virupakshaiah for petitioner again seeks for time to comply office objections. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11826-DB WP No. 14989 of 2024 4. There is no justification in seeking time to comply office objections. Writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE BSV CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1