Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 942 & 943 CIVIL APPLICATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 942 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 540 OF 2026 IN FCAST/38467/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 541 OF 2026 IN FCAST/38467/2025 MRS. DIPALI VIJAY PATEL (GUJAR) @ DIPALI MANILAL PATEL (PATIL). VERSUS SHRI. VIJAY NARADKISHOR PATEL (GUJAR). ... Adv. Bhargav Bhushan Kulkarni, Advocate for Applicant … AND 943 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 543 OF 2026 IN FCAST/38481/2025 MRS. DIPALI VIJAY PATEL (GUJAR) @ DIPALI MANILAL PATEL (PATIL). VERSUS SHRI. VIJAY NARADKISHOR PATEL (GUJAR). ... Adv. Bhargav Bhushan Kulkarni, Advocate for Applicant ...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 22/09/2026
Per Court: . Heard.
2.
learned counsel for the applicant, respondent-husband despite service, remained absent. The application is for condonation of a period of four days only. In view of the reasons
2 942 & 943 CIVIL APPLICATION stated in application, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause-B. The appeal be registered after removal of all the office objections.
3. On registration of the appeal, issue notice to respondent, returnable on 21.10.2026.
4. In addition to the regular mode, private service is also allowed.
( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/