[2026:RJ-JP:31952] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Third Bail Application No. 11432/2026 CNR: RJHC020682112026 | URN: CRLMB / 21101U / 2026 Dharmesh Sharma @ Guddu S/o Late Shri Satish Kumar Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Plot No. D-127, Sector 8, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Police Station Vidhyadhar Nagar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----AccusedPetitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandra Shekhar For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 13/08/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this third bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.0037/2026 registered with the Police Station Daulatpura (Jaipur-Ajmer Hiway), District Jaipur (West) for offence under Sections 8 and 22 of NDPS Act, 1985 2. The first bail application bearing S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3436/2026 was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 09.04.2026 with liberty to file fresh bail application after filing of challan. 3. The third bail application bearing S.B. Criminal Misc. Second Bail Application No.6427/2026 was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 27.04.2026. [2026:RJ-JP:31952] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11432/2026] 4. The learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case merely on the basis of the statements of co-accused. He further submits that the allegation against the accused-petitioner in the investigation report is that co-accused Tanishk is said to have purchased the alleged contraband from co-accused Rahul for supplying it to the present petitioner. He further submits that there is no evidence so as to connect the present petitioner with the transaction of the alleged contraband. He also submits that the alleged contraband, i.e. 29.28 gram Mephedrone, which has been recovered from the possession of co-accused Tanishk, is less than the commercial quantity. He also submits that the accused- petitioner is in custody since 14.02.2026. He further submits that co-accused namely; Tanishk and Rahul have already been enlarged on bail by this Court and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the third bail application and submits that co-accused in their statements have stated that co-accused Tanishk has purchased the alleged contraband from co-accused Rahul for giving it to the present petitioner. 6. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on reocrd. 7. The allegations against the present petitioner is that he [2026:RJ-JP:31952] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11432/2026] made demand for the alleged contraband and on making demand, the co-accused Tanishk has purchased the alleged contraband from co-accused Rahul. The alleged contraband which is involved in the present case is 29.28 gram Mephedrone, which is less than commercial quantity, stipulated under law. The accused-petitioner is said to have been in custody since 14.02.2026 and co-accused have already been enlarged on bail. 8. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that alleged contraband involved in the present criminal case, is less than commercial quantity and co-accused have already been enlarged on bail, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 9. This third bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 4/ARTI SHARMA