Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13071 (JHR)

DEEPAK KUMAR THAKUR @ RISHU THAKUR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4125/2026 · 2026-05-15

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:15029 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4125 of 2026 ----- Deepak Kumar Thakur @ Rishu Thakur, son of late Sachidanand Thakur, resident of village Balrampur, Gamharia, PO and PS Gamharia, District Seraikella Kharsawan … Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, APP …...... 02 /15.05.2026: This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 126/109/118/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of Arms Act. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order. 3. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail. 4. There is direct allegation against this petitioner that he has shot on the leg of the injured person with country-made pistol. The aforesaid fact was considered in the earlier order dated 09.03.2026 passed in BA No. 1074 of 2026 when his case for regular bail was dismissed. 5. The petitioner renews his prayer submitting that the charge-sheet has been submitted and the charge has already been framed in this case. 6. Be that at it may, since there is direct allegation against this petitioner, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. 2026:JHHC:15029 2 7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Gamharia PS Case No. 117 of 2025 (S.T. Case No. 50 of 2026), pending in the Court of learned Session Judge Seraikella stands rejected. 8. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed. 9. The petitioner may renew his prayer after examination of the injured witness. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 15.05.2026 Tanuj/CP-3 Uploaded on16.05.2026