[2026:RJ-JP:13539] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4842/2026 Subham Nahar S/o Shri Mangal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Maingate Police Line, Ajmer. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Mr. Vinod Sharma Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 01/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.97/2025 registered at Police Station Haribhau Upadhyay Nagar, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 324(4), 324(5) and 189(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He again submits that though there is an allegation against the present petitioner for causing life-threatening injuries to the injured Manoj but as per the medical report it is revealed that none of the injuries were on [2026:RJ-JP:13539] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4842/2026] vital parts. The alleged injury was on the left leg and specifically not designated as life-threatening injury. The medical opinion indicates that "cumulatively, such injuries could endanger life if timely treatment is not provided"; however, in the present case, it is not in dispute that treatment was administered in a timely manner. Petitioner is behind the bars since 29.10.2025 with criminal past of seven cases in which he is already bailed out. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Subham Nahar S/o Shri Mangal, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/49