1 APHC010213322026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 11405/2026 Between: 1. MALAPATI LEELA VATHI, W/O G. RAMARAO, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,WORKING AS MANAGER, KRISHNA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD. (DCCB), KANCHIKACHERLA BRANCH, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD DCCB, , REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, DR. YSR SAHAKARA BHAVAN, JAGANADHAPURAM, HEAD OFFICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the 2 High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings Ref No.l95/Estt/2025- 26 dated 07.04.2026 issued by the second respondent transferring the petitioner from Kanchikacherla Branch to Vatsavai Branch as Manager as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the transfer policy/guidelines, and consequently set aside the proceedings Ref No.l95/Estt/2025- 26 dated 07.04.2026 issued by the second respondent and direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Manager at the District Cooperative Central Bank, Kanchikacherla Branch, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pieased to suspend the proceedings Ref No.l95/Estt/2025-26 dated 07.04.2026 issued by the second respondent n and consequently permit the petitioner to continue at Kanchikacherla Branch as Manager, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K R SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3 3. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as cots. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date:27.04.2026 GK 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 11405 of 2026 Dated:27.04.2026 GK