-1- 939-APPLN-3366-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3366 OF 2026 1. Asaram Kamlaji Kalamkar (Father-in-Law) Age : 69 years, Occu: Agri, 2. Alkabai Asaram Kalamkar (Mother in law) Age: 60 years Occu: Agri. Both R/o. Antarawali Khandi. Tq. Paithan Dist. Ch. Sambhajinagar 3. Chhaya Appasaheb Hande Age : 41 yrs, Occu : Household R/o. Devi Krupa Building, Sonarpada, Tq. Kalyan Dist. Thane 4. Vandana Narayan Agale, Age : 38 years, Occu : Household, R/o. Gevral Bk. Tq. Paithan, Dist. Ch. Sambhajinagar 5. Vijaya Pandurang @ Raju Bodakhe Age : 35 years, Occu : Household, R/o. Chinchala Post Viha Mandwa, Tq. Paithan Dist. Ch. Sambhajinagar 6. Suverna Krushna Kuber Age : 34 years, Occu : Household, R/o. Krushna Kuber, Bhalgaon Tq. & Dist. Chh. Sambhajinagar … Applicants. (Applicant no.3 to 6 are sisters in law) Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Officer, Pachod Police Station, Pachod Dist. Ch. Sambhajinagar 2. Kajal Baliram Kalamkar Age : 21 years Occu: Fashion Designer, R/o. C/o Baliram Babasaheb Langde, At Present Brahmangaon, Tq.. Paithan Dist. Ch. Sambhajinagar ...Respondents 2026:BHC-AUG:43915 -2- 939-APPLN-3366-2026 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3680 OF 2026 Baliram Asaram Kalamkar (Husband) Age: 30 years Occu: Agri, R/o. Antarawali Khandi, Tq. Paithan Dist. Ch. Sambhajinagar … Applicant Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Officer, Pachod Police Station, Pachod Dist. Ch. Sambhajinagar 2. Kajal Baliram Kalamkar Age : 21 years Occu: Fashion Designer, R/o. C/o. Baliram Babasaheb Langde At Present Brahmangaon, Tq. Paithan Dist. Ch. Sambhajinagar … Respondents ..... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Syed Azizoddin R. APP for Respondent - State : Mr. S. D. Ghayal Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Rehan Khan ..... CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATED : 22nd SEPTEMBER 2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. I have also perused the report about the compromise submitted by the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court along with the Consent Terms filed by the parties on record. 2. The Consent Terms categorically record that the -3- 939-APPLN-3366-2026 differences between the complainant and the present applicants have been settled due to the intervention of elderly members of the society and that in the interest of the better future of the minor child, the parties have now started cohabiting with each other. The statement also records that respondent No.2-wife agrees to withdraw her complaint and FIR against the present applicants and his family members, and therefore, respondent No. 2 jointly prays that C.R. No. 317 of 2026 registered with Pachod Police Station, Tq. Paithan, Dist. Chh. Sambhajinagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS and the subsequent proceedings be quashed and set aside. 3. I have perused the investigation papers and also the material that has been placed on record. The dispute prima facie seems to have arisen out of the matrimonial relationship and the differences between the parties. Now that the husband and wife have willingly decided to cohabit with each other and lead a happy life, I am of the opinion that there is no substance in keeping the proceedings pending. 4. Hence, both Criminal Applications stand allowed. 5. The First Information Report bearing Crime No. 0317 of -4- 939-APPLN-3366-2026 2026, registered with Pachod Police Station, Tq. Paithan, District Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3), and 3(5) of the BNS and the consequential proceedings stand quashed and set aside. 6. Any consequential proceedings, such as filing of a charge-sheet or any proceedings before the Trial Court also stand quashed in view of the settlement between the parties. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR) JUDGE Tandale