112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6374-2026 Date of Decision: 16.03.2026 COL. ALOK RETD. …Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present : None HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL) 1. The aforesaid writ petition was e-filed. The petition was scrutinized and approved by the Registry, but after its approval, hard copy, which is mandatory, has not been supplied. The Registry has consequently listed the matter before this Court being incomplete and duplicate case seeking appropriate orders. 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the petition being incomplete and duplicate. The petition, as such is disposed of for want of requisite action from the counsel. However, liberty is granted to file the petition afresh in case needed. File be consigned to record room. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE March 16, 2026 (VIKAS SURI) gurpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No GURPREET KAUR 2026.03.17 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document