Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13051 (ALL)

OMENDRA AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/21846/2026 · 2026-09-30

Ajay Bhanot, Divesh Chandra Samant

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21846 of 2026 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. After some arguments, Om Narayan Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not wish to press the relief for quashing of the FIR in the writ petition. The relief sought for quashing of the FIR is accordingly declined. Sri Om Narayan Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners recast their relief and prays that the petitioners may be granted leave to approach the competent court for anticipatory bail and for seeking appropriate remedies available with them under the law. The writ petition is disposed with with the observation that it is open to the petitioners to avail other legal remedies as may be advised. October 1, 2026 ADY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Om Narayan Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Deepanshi Srivastava, Deepak Kumar Srivastava, G.A. (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Omendra And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad