[2026:RJ-JP:30093] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1727/2026 CNR: RJHC020255272026 | URN: CRLMP / 3904U / 2026 1. Jitendra Singh Son Of Bhanwar Singh, R/o Bassi, Masuda, District Beawar. 2. Umed Singh Son Of Bana Singh, R/o Moyana, Masuda, District Beawar (Raj.) 3. Lalita Wife Of Umed Singh, R/o Moyana, Masuda, District Beawar (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Banna Singh Son Of Rupa, R/o Moyana, P.s. Masuda, Dis- trict Beawar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lekhpal Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Rakesh Kumar Trivedi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 03/08/2026 1. By way of this Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.36/2026 registered at Police Station Masuda, District Beawar for offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2) & 61(2) of the BNS, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that vide order dated 17.07.2026, parties were directed to appear before the Investigating Officer for verification of compromise. He submits [2026:RJ-JP:30093] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-1727/2026] that in compliance with the directions issued by this Court, the parties appeared before the Investigating Officer and endorsed the compromise. Counsel submits that on account of compromise, further proceedings in the impugned FIR are fruitless and continuation thereof would be a futile exercise and a waste of precious judicial time and resources. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor places on record the factual report dated 02.08.2026 received from SHO, Police Station Masuda, District Beawar. According to which, dispute has been resolved between the parties amicably and there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. The said report is taken on record.. 4. Complainant of this case is present in person. He has duly been identified by his counsel. Under the instructions of the complainant, counsel submits that complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. He submits that complainant has no objection if the impugned FIR is quashed. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. versus Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, the impugned FIR is [2026:RJ-JP:30093] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-1727/2026] liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.36/2026 registered at Police Station Masuda, District Beawar is quashed and set aside qua the petitioners along with subsequent proceedings. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN/50