Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1305 (RAJ)

SATISH KUMAR S/O SHRI PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4057/2026 · 2026-04-07

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:14399] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4057/2026 1. Satish Kumar S/o Shri Pratap Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vijay Nagar, Barson Ka Nagla, Police Station Atalband, District Bharatpur, Raj. 2. Damodar S/o Shri Ghanshyam, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vijay Nagar, Barson Ka Nagla, Police Station Atalband, District Bharatpur, Raj. 3. Smt. Vaijanti W/o Shri Ghanshyam, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Vijay Nagar, Barson Ka Nagla, Police Station Atalband, District Bharatpur, Raj. 4. Smt. Neeraj W/o Shri Damodar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vijay Nagar, Barson Ka Nagla, Police Station Atalband, District Bharatpur, Raj. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Navankur Dubey HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 07/04/2026 After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with liberty to the petitioners to surrender before the concerned Court. Permission, as sought for, is granted. This bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. is dismissed as withdrawn. However, if the petitioners surrender before the [2026:RJ-JP:14399] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4057/2026] concerned trial Court and files a fresh bail application, it is expected from the concerned court to decide the bail application of the petitioners, as far as possible, on the same day, in accordance with law. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/100