Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13048 (BOM)

CHAITALI VASUDEO NEMADE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

CA/1042/2026 · 2026-09-22

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 901-CA-1042-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1042 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 14031 OF 2025 CHAITALI VASUDEO NEMADE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & OTHERS ..… Mr. Hemant P. Kshirsagar, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. P. N. Kalani, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. ..... CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATED : 22nd SEPTEMBER 2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant. 2. Present application is filed in the nature of Review petition seeking recalling of the judgment and order dated 25.11.2025 passed in Writ Petition No. 14031 of 2025. 3. The application is perused. Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that the order which is impugned in the present application for recalling, in fact, was passed on the basis of the wrong prayers which were made in the earlier petition. Taking this submission into consideration, we do not find that the present application can be entertained because there is no error apparent on the face of record. 4. The application therefore stands dismissed. 2026:BHC-AUG:44105-DB -2- 901-CA-1042-2026 5. However, in order to preserve justice, this Court permits the applicant to file fresh petition challenging the original order which was impugned in Writ Petition No.14031 of 2025 by making appropriate prayer. [HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] Tandale