IN THE HI 114-A The Estate O Shehri Vikas Samunder Si CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent f suit for dec permanent i decreed. 2. instructions second appe 3. 4. 5. 20.01.2026 rishu E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H RSA Date o state Officer, Haryana Urban Develop i Vikas Pardhikaran Versus der Singh and other M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Abhishek Sindhu, Advocate Mr.Dhananjay Mittal, Advocate I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Appellant-defendant No. 1 is rrent findings rendered by the learned r declaration, mandatory injunction nent injunction filed by respondents At the very outset, learned c tions submits that he may be permi appeal. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1628-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.01.2026 evelopment Authority, now Haryana .… Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA vocate for vocate for the appellant. 1 is in second appeal against the earned District Courts, whereby the nction with consequential relief of ndents No. 1 and 2-plaintiffs was rned counsel for the appellant on permitted to withdraw the present any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No ana the the f of was on sent RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.20 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.