VIKAS VISHWANATH DOLAS v. GAIKWAD KRUSHI SEVA KENDRA, THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR, SUDHAKAR PUNJARAM GAIKWAD AND ANOTHER
APPLN/3926/2026 · 2026-09-28
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13047 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13047 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
*1* 2appln3926o26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3926 OF 2026 IN REVN/329/2026 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 329 OF 2026 VIKAS VISHWANATH DOLAS VERSUS GAIKWAD KRUSHI SEVA KENDRA, THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR, SUDHAKAR PUNJARAM GAIKWAD AND ANOTHER … Shri Gaikwad Kishor G., Advocate for the Applicant. Shri A.A.A. Khan, APP for the Respondents/ State. ...
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 28 September 2026 P. C. :-
1. Heard.
2. Issue Notice to the respondents returnable on
19.10.2026. Learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent/State.
3. Criminal Application No.3926/2026 is filed for suspension of sentence imposed by the learned JMFC vide the impugned judgment and order dated 24.03.2026 in SCC No.421/2023, which is later on confirmed by the learned
*2* 2appln3926o26 Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Criminal Appeal No.88/2026 vide judgment and order dated 11.09.2026. By the impugned judgment, the applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and he is sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for three months and pay fine of Rs.2,45,000/- and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for 30 days.
4. The learned advocate for the applicant states that the applicant has deposited an amount of Rs.50,000/- before the Appellate Court at the time of suspension of sentence. Upon instructions, the learned advocate states that the applicant is willing to deposit Rs.50,000/- more in this Court, on or before
12.10.2026.
5. In view of the above and considering the quantum of sentence and the fact that the revision application having been filed in 2026 would take some time to be heard and decided, the sentence needs to be suspended. Hence, I proceed to pass the following order :-
ORDER
*3* 2appln3926o26 (i) The substantive sentence imposed on the applicant vide the impugned judgment and order, stands suspended during the pendency of the instant Criminal Revision Application. (ii) The applicant be released on P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount. (iii) Bail before the Trial Court. (iv) In case, the applicant fails to deposit the amount as undertaken above, this order would be recalled on the next date. kps ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )