( 2026:JHHC:14661 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 843 of 2026 1. Vinay Kumar, aged abut 45 years, son of Om Prakash resident of Thuraila, Bashta P.O. and P.S. Bashta, District-Bijnour State-U.P.-246736 2. Shakun Karnwal, aged abut 51 years, son of Radhey Shyam Karanwal, resident of Railpar, Gali No. 3, Railway Station, Railpar, P.O. and P.S. Shyamali, District-Shyamali, State-U.P., 247776 ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Devesh Ajmani, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Ahok Kr. Jha, Advocate 02/ 13.05.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Ranchi Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 91 of 2024, registered under sections 318(4), 336 (3) of BNS and Section 66(C), 66(D) of I.T. Act, pending in the Court of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-II, Ranchi-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He next submits that no specific allegation is made against the petitioners and allegation is general and omnibus. He next submits that pursuant to App the victim has already received Rs. 2,58,621 out of Rs. 4,42,973/-. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsels for the State and informant oppose the prayer and submit that three layer bank account has been utilized fraudulently for transferring the money and in view of that the anticipatory bail of the petitioner may kindly be rejected. 5. It has come in the order of the learned Sessions Judge that as ( 2026:JHHC:14661 ) per para nos. 16, 30 and 65 the bank accounts of the petitioners have been used for three layer transfer of money. The case is arising out of cyber crime. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. Dt.13.05.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-