SOFIYA AASHIFULLAH SHEIKH @ SUFIA SHAIKH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.M.P./1235/2026 · 2026-05-08
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13034 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13034 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 2026:JHHC:13970 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
----
Cr.M.P. No. 1235 of 2026
---- Sofiya Aashifullah, Sheikh @ Sufia Shaikh, aged about 36 years, wife of Md. Ashifullah Shekh, resident of Village and PO Chatarpur, PS Rajrappa, District Ramgarh.... Petitioner(s) -- Versus --
1.The State of Jharkhand
2.Ayesha Khatoon aged about 62 years wife of Miraj Shameem Baig Mistri Mohalla near Old High Court Doranda, PO and PS Doranda, Ranchi
…… ….. .... Opp. Parties
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner(s) :- Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Manoj Kr Mishra, Advocate
---- 2/08.05.2026 This petition has been filed for cancellation of bail to the OP No.2 passed in ABA No.4956 of 2025.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the basis of the compromise the anticipatory bail was granted to the OP No.2 however the terms and conditions of the said anticipatory bail are not being fulfilled by the OP No.2 and in view of that, anticipatory bail may kindly be cancelled.
3.
Learned counsel for the State submits that on the baiss of compromise the anticipatory bail was allowed.
4.
On the basis of the compromise between the petitioner and the OP No.2 the anticipatory bail was allowed and there are
2 criteria of cancellation of bail once granted, and those are, as under:
“(i) the accused misuses his liberty by indulging in similar criminal activity, (ii) interferes with the course of investigation, (iii) attempts to tamper with evidence or witnesses, (iv) threatens witnesses or indulges in similar activities which would hamper smooth investigation, (v) there is likelihood of his fleeing to another country, (vi) attempts to make himself scarce by going underground or becoming unavailable to the investigating agency, (vii) attempts to place himself beyond the reach of his surety, etc.”
5.
Only on the cogent reasons, once the bail granted, can be cancelled. The said anticipatory bail was granted on the basis of compromise and no case for cancellation of anticipatory bail to OP No.2 is made out.
6. As such, this Cr.M.P.No.1235 of 2026 is hereby dismissed.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Dated : 08.05.2026 SI/