Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13032 (BOM)

VASUDEO DHONDIRAM PUJARI v. MANIK LADDU SAKHARE AND ANOTHER

CA/4627/2006 · 2026-09-22

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 913 FIRST APPEAL NO. 677 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4627 OF 2006 IN FA/677/2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10727 OF 2026 IN FA/677/2006 VASUDEO DHONDIRAM PUJARI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ... Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.P. Golewar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. A.M. Phule Advocate for Respondent 2 : Mr. D.L. Vakil … CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. Dated : September 22, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Civil Application No. 10727/2026 filed for bringing the legal heirs of deceased appellant on record by condoning the delay. In view of the averments made in the application, the application is is allowed. Abatement, if any, is set aside. Legal heirs of deceased appellant be brought on record. Amendment be carried out. 2. The present appeal is filed under section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act 1849. Both the counsel submits that in Special Civil Suit No. 323/1991 civil court decreed the suit partly and against the said decision, Regular Civil Appeal No. 483/2012 is filed and the same is pending. 3. In view of the above, the present first appeal is disposed of with direction to the appellate court to decide the Regular Civil Appeal No. 483/2012 within a period of three months from today. 4. Pending Civil applications, if any, are also disposed of. 5. The amount deposited in this court, if any, be transmitted to the appellate court. ( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) ssc/ 2026:BHC-AUG:43325