Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13026 (ALL)

UDAY RAJ v. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND OTHERS

A227/251/2012 · 2026-10-07

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 251 of 2012 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the court below to decide the 6 C application of the petitioner in Original Suit No.139/2011, Uday Raj versus Hari Lal pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahganj, Jaunpur." 2. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of 6-C application pending in Original Suit No.139 of 2011. Almost 15 years' have elapsed, by now, 6-C application must have been decided. 3. In case, 6-C application has not been decided till date, trial Court shall make every effort to decide the said application within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law, after hearing all the affected parties. 4. With aforesaid observations, writ petition stands disposed of. October 8, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : I.B. Yadav, Jai Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Uday Raj .....Petitioner(s) Civil Judge J.D. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad