SMT. BELSIYA BAI RATHORE v. CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY LIMITED
WPS/2449/2025 · 2026-03-29
Shri Parth Prateem Sahu
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13025 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13025 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 2
2026:CGHC:14838
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2449 of 2025 Smt. Belsiya Bai Rathore W/o Late Heera Lal Rathore Aged About 56 Years R/o Village- Hirri, Tahsil And District Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited Through Its Managing Director, 2nd Floor, Vidhyut Sewa Bhawan, Daganiya, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Deputy General Manager (Pension) Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited, 3rd Floor, In Front Of Vidhyut Sewa Bhawan, Daganiya, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Executive Director Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited, Ground Floor, In Front Of Vidhyut Sewa Bhawan, Daganiya, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Chief Accounts Officer Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited, Ground Floor, In Front Of Vidhyut Sewa Bhawan, Daganiya, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Regional Accounts Officer Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2026.04.04 12:05:20 +0530
2 / 2 Company
Limited,
Bilaspur,
District
Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh. 6 - Munni Bai Wd/o Late Heera Lal Rathore Aged About 52 Years R/o Hirri, Tahsil And District Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh.
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Najmeen Begum, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Yogendra Chaturvedi, Advocate For Resp. No. 1 to 5 : Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate For Resp. No.6 : Ms. Jyoti Rathor, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order on Board 30/03/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that relief as sought for by the petitioner in this writ petition has been granted and therefore this writ petition is rendered infructuous. She submits that she may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents do not oppose submission of
learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. In view of submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen