HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40600 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Admittedly, petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy of filing an appeal to challenge the impugned order, therefore, any argument that this writ petition may be heard at the first instance cannot be accepted mainly on two grounds (i) An incorrect declaration has been made in paragraph no.29 of writ petition that there is no alternative remedy, (ii) Otherwise also, pleadings are not to the extent that why this writ petition be heard at the first instance since there is no absolute bar. 3. In the aforesaid circumstances, there is no reason to entertain this writ petition at the first instance, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to file an appeal. October 7, 2026 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Archit Mandhyan, Rishabh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Shahnawaj Ansari .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad