Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13021 (CHH)

NARESH TIWARI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2305/2026 · 2026-03-09

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:11360 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2305 of 2026 1 - Naresh Tiwari S/o Shri Sheshnarayan Tiwari Aged About 40 Years Presently Posted As Field Assistant At The Office Of District Marketing Officer, C.G. State Co- Operative Marketing Federation Limited, Distt. Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Co-Operative Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Secretary C.G. State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Limited, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Managing Director C.G. State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Limited, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Marketing Officer C.G. State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Limited, Distt. Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Veer Verma, Advocate along with Mr. Ankush Borkar, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Vivek Verma, Government Advocate For Respondent No. 2 to 4 : Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 10/03 /2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- 2 “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus modifying the posting/transfer portion of the promotion order dated 31.12.2025 (Annexure P/1) to the extent it posts the petitioner to District Office, Sarangarh – Bilaigarh (C.G.) and direct the respondents to retain the petitioner at his present place of posting i.e. District Office, Khairagarh- Chhuikhadan-Gandai (C.G.) upon promotion to Senior Assistant. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamu directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representations dated 23.01.2026 (Annexure P/3) sympathetically on humanitarian/medical grounds, in light of the medical conditions of the petitioner’s mother, and pass appropriate orders modifying the posting while granting promotion benefits. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief/relief’s in favour of the petitioner, which the Hon’ble Court deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner while working on the post of Field Assistant was promoted on the post of Senior Assistant vide order dated 31.12.2025. The order of promotion though is dated 31.12.2025, however, it is informed to the petitioner on 13.01.2026 and immediately thereafter, petitioner submitted representation on 14.01.2026 before the Respondents No. 2 & 3, however, till date no decision has been taken. It is contention of the petitioner that the representation was made on the ground that mother of the petitioner is suffering with Sugar disease due to which, she suffered complications in the injury suffered on her leg and she is under continuous treatment. 3. On the other hand, Learned counsel for the Respondents No. 2 to 4 would submit that as petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to the Respondents No. 2 & 3 to consider and take decision on the representation, he is having no objection to the limited prayer. He submits that the representation will be considered and decided in accordance with law at the earliest, if not considered till now. 3 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents placed on record. 5. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, facts and circumstances of the case, nature of grievance raised by the petitioner, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing the Respondents No. 2 to 4 to consider and take decision on the representation submitted by the petitioner sympathetically in an objective manner, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 10 days from today. It is further directed to the learned counsel for the Respondents No. 2 to 4 to inform the authorities about the order passed by this Court. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY