DEVRAO BHUJANGRAO PHUKE v. GURULING KASHINATH PIMPALAE and ORS
CA/7355/2003 · 2026-09-28
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13018 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13018 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 34-WP-2274-03.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2274 OF 2003 GURULING KASHINATH PIMPALE VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. R. T. Nagorgoje AGP for Respondents No.1 to 4 : Mr. P. D. Patil ...
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3532 OF 2005 IN WP/2274/2003 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7355 OF 2003 IN WP/2274/2003 ...
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 28-09-2026 PER COURT:-
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that in view of subsequent developments, nothing survives in the petition for consideration.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
3. Rule stands discharged.
4. Pending civil applications stand disposed of.
[SACHIN S. DESHMUKH]
JUDGE rrd 2026:BHC-AUG:44085