SUBHAM YADAV v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/24488/2026 · 2026-10-06
Devendra Singh I, Rajiv Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13018 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13018 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24488 of 2026 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to file fresh with better particulars.
3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
5. Certified copy of the relevant documents, if any, be returned back to learned counsel for the petitioner as per Rules. October 7, 2026 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akash Kumar Nishad, Ashutosh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Subham Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad