Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13015 (BOM)

PUNYRATHA VILAS NAIK AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

APEAL/633/2026 · 2026-09-30

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 633 OF 2026 PUNYRATHA VILAS NAIK AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Ms. Shital S. Karle h/f Mr. Shriram Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate for Appellants Mr. M. K. Jadhav, Advocate for Respondent No.4 Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for the Respondent/State CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATED : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Learned Advocate for the Appellants, on instructions, submits that the Appellants have surrendered before the Police and, therefore, the present appeal has become infructuous. She, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. 2. In view of the above, the appeal stands disposed of as having become infructuous. ( R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp 902 APEAL 633.2026.odt 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:44707