Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13015 (ALL)

SHUBHAM AGARWAL AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/3802/2025 · 2026-10-06

Jai Krishna Upadhyay, Rajeev Misra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3802 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J. 1. Heard Mr. Shekhar Gangal, the learned counsel for petitioners, and the learned AGA representing State respondents 1, 2 and 3. 2. Even though the names of Ms. Neetu Singh, Mr. Nishant Kumar and Mr. Prashant Kumar Bhardwaj are published in the cause list as counsel for the first informant respondent no.4, but neither they nor anyone on their behalf is present to oppose the present writ petition even in revised call. 3.Perused the record. 4. Petitioner, Shubham Agarwal and 6 others, have approached this Court by means of present criminal misc. writ petition challenging the impugned FIR dated 10.01.2025 lodged by first informant/respondent 4, Smt. Shikha Bansal, and registered as Case Crime No. 15 of 2025, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station Goverdhan, District Mathura. 5.On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for petitioners fairly submits that during the pendency of present writ petition, Investigating Officer, upon completion of statutory investigation of aforementioned case crime number has submitted the charge sheet dated 21.02.2025, upon which cognizance has also been taken by the Jurisdictional Magistrate. Resultantly, petitioners have approached this Court by means of an application under Section 528 BNSS. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaurav Sharma, Shekhar Gangal Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Neetu Singh, Nishant Kumar, Prashant Kumar Bhardwaj Shubham Agarwal And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 6.In view of above, the writ petition has now been rendered infructuous. 7.It is accordingly dismissed as having rendered infructuous. 8.Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. October 7, 2026 AKT CRLP No. 3802 of 2025 2 (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad