IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13809 of 2026 In Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1390 of 2022 ====================================================== Bijay Kishore Prasad S/O Late Balram Prasad R/O 328, A. P. Colony, Gaya, near Indira Gandhi Stadium, Gaya, P.S.- Rampur, District- Gaya. Permanent Add. Vill.- Alhan Parasi, P.O.- Singhari, Anchal and P.S.- Goh, Dist.- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna Bihar 2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna Bihar 3. The Inspector General of Police, Magadh Range, Gaya Bihar 4. The D.I.G, Magadh Range, Gaya Bihar 5. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad Bihar 6. The Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad Bihar 7. The Station House Officer, Goh Police Station, Aurangabad Bihar 8. Chandra Shekhar Prasad S/O Late Shyam Bihari Prasad R/O Santan kutir, B/53, Flat no. 2, Second Floor, Housing Colony, P.S.- Kankarbagh, Patna 9. Santan Sharma S/O Not known R/O Village- Alhan Parasi, P.S- Goh, District- Aurangabad 10. Manoj Sharma S/O Not Known R/O Village- Alhan Parasi, P.S- Goh, District- Aurangabad 11. Nitesh Sharma S/O Not Known R/O Village- Alhan Parasi, P.S- Goh, District- Aurangabad 12. Pramod Sharma S/O Not Known R/O Village- Alhan Parasi, P.S- Goh, District- Aurangabad 13. Vinod Sharma S/O Not Known R/O Village- Alhan Parasi, P.S- Goh, District- Aurangabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arun Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the respondent no. 8 : Mr.Siddharth Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr.A.A.G.3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 11-03-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present application seeks modification/recall of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13809 of 2026(2) dt.11-03-2026 2/2 the Court order dated 24.07.2025 in Cr.W.J.C. No. 1390/2022, which directed police to provide protection to the petitioner for agricultural activities and to take legal action against anyone, including private respondents, causing obstruction, and to issue prohibitory orders if required according to applicable law. 3. Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, learned counsel for respondent no. 8 has objected to the maintainability of this application and has submitted that a review of the order dated 24.07.2025 cannot be done by this Court. 4. In these circumstances, this application is held to be not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed but with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Division Bench in Letters Patent jurisdiction in view of judgment dated 18.02.2026 of this Court in case of Bhushan Prasad @ Shashi Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Ors in L.P.A. No. 1143/2025. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T