Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13011 (AP)

BURLE SATYAM v. V PADMAVATHI

CC/4210/2022 · 2026-10-09

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010426442022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] SATURDAY, THE 10th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4210/2022 Between: 1. BURLE SATYAM, S/O APPALA SWAMI, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/ O. KONDAGANDREDU VILLAGE, GURLA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 2. BURLE RAMA RAO, S/O APPALA SWAMI, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. KONDAGANDREDU VILLAGE, GURLA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3. BURLE RAMANA, S/O APPALA SWAMI, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. KONDAGANDREDU VILLAGE, GURLA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. V PADMAVATHI, D/O NOT KNOWN, TAHSILDAR, GURLA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2. P LAVANYA, TAHSILDAR, PUSAPATIREGA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT (PREVIOUSLY WORKED AS TAHSILDAR OF GURLA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT) ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents No. 1 and 2 under the Contempt of Court Act for willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders of the Honble High Court passed in W.P.No. 21129 of 2021 dated 23.09.2021 2 SRK,J CC.No.4210 of 2022 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. TADDI NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. P SUBASH The Court made the following: 3 SRK,J CC.No.4210 of 2022 O R D E R This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents/contemnors for contempt of court for their willful and deliberate disobedience in complying with the Order dated 23.09.2021 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 21129 of 2021. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that, in pursuance of the Order dated 23.09.2021 passed by this Court in W.P. No.21129 of 2021, the respondents/officials have complied with the said order. The same is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Recording the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the respondents, the Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Contempt Case, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Date: 10.10.2026. MS / DS 4 SRK,J CC.No.4210 of 2022 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Contempt Case No: 4210 of 2022 Date: 10.10.2026 MS