Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13008 (KAR)

LIGHTHOUSE MALL MANAGEMENT COMPANY PVT LTD v. SANCUBE INFRA PROJECTS PVT LTD

CMP/590/2024 · 2026-02-20

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11436 CMP No. 590 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 590 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. LIGHTHOUSE MALL MANAGEMENT COMPANY PVT. LTD. REGISTERED OFFICE AT G/1, ROYAL OAK, 4TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, DEFENCE COLONY INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE-560038 OPERATING OFFICE #845, 1ST FLOOR, 5TH CROSS, 10TH MAIN, INDIRANAGAR 2ND STAGE BANGALORE-560038 www.lighthousemalls.com REPD BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY RAJESHWARI, GROUP MANAGER …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NATARAJ G, ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11436 CMP No. 590 of 2024 1. SANCUBE INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. NO.11/C, GROUND FLOOR, JAISHRI NARAYAN CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY SUBHANPURA, GORWA VADODARA-390023 GUJARAT REPTD BY ITS LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPT DURBA BHATTACHARYA …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ANANYA RAGHAVENDRA, ADVOCATE) THIS CIVIL MISC. PETITION IS FILED UNDER SEC.11(6) OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT BE PLEASED TO APPOINT THE SOLE ARBITRATOR TO ARBITRATE THE DISPUTE THAT HAS ARISEN BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AGREEMENT DATED 18.12.2021 BY REFERRING THE SAME TO THE ARBITRATION CENTRE, KHANIJA BHAVAN, AT BENGALURU, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11436 CMP No. 590 of 2024 ORAL ORDER The petitioner filed this petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for the appointment of an Arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the parties to the petition as per the provisions of the Act. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that, this Court has no jurisdiction in view of clause 21.1.2 of the agreement dated 18.12.2021 vide Annexure-D. She submits that, the dispute has to be resolved in Ahmedabad (Gujarat) under the jurisdiction of local Courts in English. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking a leave of the Court to withdraw this petition with a liberty to approach the High Court of Gujarat. 4. The memo is taken on record. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11436 CMP No. 590 of 2024 6. In view of disposal of the petition, pending IA(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 7. The Registry is directed to return the originals/certified copies of the documents, if any, after retaining the photocopies of the same. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE PA List No.: 2 Sl No.: 27