Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13006 (PNJ)

NEENA GOYAL v. AMAR SINGH & ANR

RSA/1126/2013 · 2026-03-18

Nidhi Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CM-13016 RSA-1126- IN THE HIG 225 Neena Goya Amar Singh CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. Order XXIII the main (Annexure 2. entire disput stand settled (Annexure may be allo 12.08.2026 withdraw the the parties. 16-C-2025 in -2013 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA   CM- RSA Date o Goyal Versus Singh and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Ms. Simranpreet Kaur Dhawan, Ms. Anamika Sheoran, Advocat Mr. Armaan Saggar, Advocate f I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the application (CM XXIII Rule 3 CPC read with Section main appeal in terms of com A-1) arrived at between the partie Learned counsel for the applic disputes which are the subject matter settled between the parties by way of c xure A-1). It is, accordingly, prayed e allowed; and the main appeal wh 2026 be taken up today itself; and aw the same in terms of aforesaid co rties. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -13016-C-2025 in RSA-1126-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.03.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA awan, Advocate for dvocate for the applicant-appellant. ocate for respondent No. 1. CM-13016-C-2025) filed under ection 151 CPC, is for disposal of compromise dated 07.05.2025 parties. applicant/appellant submits that the matter of the present second appeal ay of compromise dated 07.05.2025 prayed that the present application eal which is fixed for hearing on lf; and she may be permitted to aid compromise arrived at between nder l of the peal tion to een RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.20 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CM-13016 RSA-1126- 3. factum of co objection’ in appeal is dis A-1). 4. is allowed; 1126-2013 is dismissed (Annexure 5. terms and co 6. 18.03.2026 rishu 16-C-2025 in -2013 (O&M) -2- Learned counsel for responden of compromise between the parties ion’ in case the present application is l is disposed of in terms of compromise In view of the above, (i) the app ; (ii) the date of hearing in the is preponed from 12.08.2026 to missed as withdrawn in terms of xure A-1) effected between the parties It is needless to say that both and conditions of the aforesaid compro Pending application(s), if any, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ondent No. 1 has not disputed the parties and submits that he has ‘no tion is allowed and the main second romise dated 07.05.2025 (Annexure the application (CM-13016-C-2025) the main second appeal i.e. RSA- 26 to today itself; and (iii) the same compromise dated 07.05.2025 parties. both the parties shall abide by the ompromise (Annexure A-1). any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No the ‘no ond xure ) the RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.20 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.