Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13003 (JHR)

AMAR PRASAD AGRAWAL ALIAS AMAR AGRAWAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.Rev./506/2022 · 2026-05-12

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:14545 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 506 of 2022 ------ 1. Amar Prasad Agrawal @ Amar Agrawal, aged 57 years, 2. Dilip Kumar Agrawal, aged 46 years, 3. Shiv Prasad Agrawal, aged 60 years, all sons of Late Durga Prasad Agrawal, 4. Shankar Agrawal @ Ravi Shankar Prasad Agrawal @ Ravi Shankar Kumar, aged 37 years, son of Late Jawahar Prasad Agrawal, 5. Deepak Kumar Agrawal, aged 55 years, son of Late Durga Prasad Agrawal, 6. Meera Devi, aged 50 years, wife of Deepak Kumar Agrawal, 7. Surabhi Kumari Agrawal, aged 30 years, daughter of Deepak Kumar Agrawal, 8. Umang Kumar, aged 25 years, son of Deepak Kumar Agrawal, all residents of Bid Gumla Road, P.O. and P.S. – Lohardaga, District – Lohardaga. …. .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shalu Prabha Tirkey, Sub-Inspector-cum-Officer In-charge, Lohardaga, W/o Suresh Oraon, aged about 50 years, Present Address – R/o Lohardaga Mohila Police Station, P.S. + District – Lohardaga. .... .... Opp. Parties ------ Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ------ For the Petitioners : Ms. Sonal Sodhani, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No. 08 / Dated 12.05.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners, after facing trial, have been acquitted in the case being Lohardaga Mahila P.S. Case No. 25 of 2019, therefore, present revision against the order dated 04.02.2022 rejecting the discharge application filed by the present petitioners, has become infructuous. 2026:JHHC:14545 2 2. In view of the above, this criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) May 12, 2026 Sunil/ Uploaded on 14/05/2026