Amresh Yadav @ Amresh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
/25547/2026 · 2026-04-18
Ashok Kumar Pandey
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13000 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13000 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25547 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-233 Year-2024 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Amresh Yadav @ Amresh Kumar Yadav Son of Devendra Prasad Yadav R/o Village - Karhari, P.S.- Laukahi, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Hriday Narayan Harshit, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ahmad Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 18-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126 (1), 115 (2), 118 (1), 117 (2), 109, 103 (1) and 3 (5) of the BNS.
3. The case of the prosecution is that petitioner along with co-accused assaulted the informant’s father by iron rod, lathi, danda, butt of the gun and fists. It is further alleged that the informant was also assaulted by co-acused persons and later doctor declared informant’s father dead.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. Charge sheet hass been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that the specific
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25547 of 2026(2) dt.18-04-2026 2/2 allegation of assault is against Raja Yadav and Devendra Yadav. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 03.09.2025 and 15.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 29163 of 2025 and 67024 of 2025. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 07.11.2025 having no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 233 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge – I, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani.
Jagdish/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T