Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12998 (CHH)

XYZ v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/240/2026 · 2026-05-05

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21094-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 240 of 2026 XYZ Nil ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Homes, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya, P.S. Rakhi, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director General Of Police (D G P) Chhattisgarh, Police Head Quarters (P H Q), Sector 19, Near Mantralaya, Kotara Bantha, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Superintendent Of Police Sakti, District Sakti Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Station House Officer Police Station Malkharoda, Distt. Sakti Chhattisgarh 5 - Umesh Sahu S/o Rupnarayan Sahu Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Danot, Gharghoda, Tashil And Distt. Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vipin Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Dr. Sourabh Pandey, Dy.A.G. 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 06/05/2026 1. Heard Mr. Vipin Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Dr. Sourabh Pandey, learned Dy. Advocate General, appearing for Respondent/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following reliefs: "10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue the writ of mandamus commanding upon the respondents no. 1 to 4 and direct them to arrest the respondent no. 5 immediately for the crime registered in police station Malkharoda Distt. Sakti (CG) in FIR no. 120/2026, in the interest of Justice. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire relevant records from the respondents. 10.3 That, Any other order of orders or Direction or Relief though just and fit in the circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted." 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, during the pendency of the present writ petition, the relief sought in paragraph 3 10.1 has become infructuous, as the petitioner has already been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 23.04.2026 passed in MCRCA No. 554/2026. 4. In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice sagrika