Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12997 (JHR)

MADAN LAL PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2378/2026 · 2026-05-11

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2026:JHHC:14104] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2378 of 2026 Madan Lal Prasad, aged about 30 yrs. S/o Tribhuwan Prasad, R/o Kandra, Hetkandra, Coal Board Colony, P.O. & P.S. Sindri, Dist. Dhanbad. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 11.05.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sindri P.S. Case No. 12 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 115(2)/126(2)/117(2)/308(4)/ 329(4)/303(2)/351(2)/352/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the allegation has been made by his colleague and the petitioner has left the office four days prior to lodging of the FIR. He next submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-12 of the petition. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of snatching of Rs. 50,000/-. 5. In the FIR itself, it has been stated that the petitioner and the informant were working together in Pika Sone Enterprises [ 2026:JHHC:14104] -2- Company and it is not clear that how all of a sudden motive has come to snatch the said amount and further the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para- 12 of the petition and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad, in connection with Sindri P.S. Case No. 12 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-11.05.2026 Amitesh/-