Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12990 (GAU)

GAZI RAHMAN AND 2 ORS v. MAMATA HOJAI

Cont.Cas(C)/771/2023 · 2026-08-23

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010281522023 2026:GAU-AS:12099 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/771/2023 GAZI RAHMAN AND 2 ORS S/O LATE AYNAL HOQUE, R/O VILL-SOUTH SALMARA PART-II, P.O. AND P.S.-SOUTH SALMARA, DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, PIN-783127 2: ZAKIR HUSSAIN BEPARI S/O LATE GHUTU BEPARI VILL- BAPUZI NAGAR (SHALBARI) P.O.-BOLODMARI P.S.-GOALPARA DIST- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN-783121 3: ZOHIRUL ISLAM MOLLAH S/O KOBAD HOSSAIN MOLLAH VILL-SOUTH SALMARA PART-I P.O. AND P.S.-SOUTH SALMARA DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR PIN-78312 VERSUS MAMATA HOJAI DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI-781019 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M MONDAL, MR N SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 24-08-2026 1. Mr. S.M.T.Chistie, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the order dated 16.10.2023 passed in WP(C) No. 1936/2023 has already been complied with and a Speaking Order dated 21.02.2024 has already been passed. 2. A copy of the said Speaking Order is also furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the order dated 16.10.2023 stands complied with; the present contempt petition stands closed. 4. It is needless to say that the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the appropriate forum, if any fresh cause of action arises or is aggrieved by the Speaking Order. JUDGE Comparing Assistant