Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12985 (CHH)

SHRI KRISHNA NAGAR RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

/599/2026 · 2026-02-09

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:7313 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 599 of 2026 1 - Shri Krishna Nagar Residents Association Through Its President, Shri Rajesh Kumar Sharma S/o Late Radheshyam Sharma Aged About 59 Years, R/o Krishna Colony, Ward No. 18, Tilda, P.S. Nevra, Tehsil- Tilda, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Collector Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The SDO (Revenue) Tilda-Newra, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Tehsildar Tilda Tehsil- Tilda, Newra, District- Raipur. 5 - Director Town And Country Planning, Raipur, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - M/s. Shri Krishna Colonizer Through Its Partner, Shri Sunil Kumar Gupta, S/o Kedarnath Gupta, R/o Mohaba Bazar, Raipur, Village Tilda, P.H.N. 19, Tehsil- Tilda, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Shri Shailesh Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 to 4 : Shri Shobhit Mishra, Advocate. NIRMALA RAO 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 10.02.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order passed by the Tehsildar under Section 250 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code (CGLRC) is without jurisdiction and is bad in law. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would submit that the order passed by the Tehsildar in a proceeding under Section 250 of the CGLRC is appealable according to the provisions of Section 44 of the Code. 3. Heard. 4. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy to prefer an appeal against the order passed by the Tehsildar, therefore, in my opinion, this petition is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed. 5. Certified copy of the order be returned back to counsel for the petitioner after retaining its xerox copy on record. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi