182.20CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 7 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.182 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10367 OF 2019 MANISHA RAMESH TAYADE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Yeramwar [Through V.C.] AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.Rajdeep D. Raut … CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 28.09.2026 P.C. : 1] The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the order under contempt is already complied with by deciding tribe claim of the petitioner. 2] In view of the same, nothing survives in the present petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC 2026:BHC-AUG:44685-DB