Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12984 (KAR)

B. RUKMINIAMMA ALIAS RUKKAMMA v. SATHYANARAYAN A H

CCC/1179/2023 · 2026-02-12

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8814-DB C.C.C. No.1179/2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.1179/2023 BETWEEN: 1. B. RUKMINIAMMA ALIAS RUKKAMMA WIFE OF LATE SRI. K.V.S. RAMASWAMY AND DAUGHTER OF LATE JUSTICE SRI. BALAKRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 92 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.2613, (OLD NO.79) 37TH B CROSS, 26TH MAIN ROAD 9TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BANGALORE-560069. 2. SMT. B. SAVITRI WIFE OF LATE M.T.M. GIRIYAPPA AND DAUGHTER OF LATE SRI. BALAKRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.7 GIRIKRUPA, 2ND MAIN ROAD SRIPURAM, SHESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE 560 020. …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI. KASHYAP N. NAIK, ADV.,) AND: 1. SATHYANARAYAN A.H. SON OF LATE HARIKRISHNA A.C. Digitally signed by ARSHIFA BAHAR KHANAM HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8814-DB C.C.C. No.1179/2023 AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.32/A, 1ST MAIN ROAD NEXT TO SYNDICATE BANK SHESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE-560 020. 2. CHAITHRA POORNIMA K.V. WIFE OF NARENDRABABU M.R. AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.5 KOTHIHOSAHALLI, KODIGEHALLI PATEL NANJEGOWDA LAYOUT SAHAKARANAGAR, BANGALORE 560 092. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. GIRISH D.S. ADV., FOR A2 SMT. ARCHANA K.M. ADV., APPOINTED AS AMICUS CURIAE FOR A1 V/O/DTD:23.10.2025) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS TRIABLE AGAINST THE ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 AND PUNISH THEM UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, WITH SIMPLE IMPRISONMENT FOR A TERM OF SIX MONTHS AND IMPOSE FINE OF RS.2,000/- (RUPEES TWO THOUSAND ONLY) ON THE ACCUSED FOR WILFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 26.09.2023 PASSED IN WP NO.21723/2023 & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8814-DB C.C.C. No.1179/2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) 1. This contempt petition is filed alleging the willful disobedience of the interim order dated 26.09.2023 passed in W.P.No.21723/2023. The assertion made in the petition is that in violation of the status quo order granted by this Court, accused Nos.1 and 2 have demolished item No.1 of the suit schedule property. 2. The accused entered appearance and filed the counter to the contempt petition. The contention of the accused is that accused No.1 acquired the right under the Will dated 06.07.1998. By virtue of the said Will, accused No.1 executed a gift deed in respect of item No.1 in favour of accused No.2 on 16.09.2021 and in respect of item No.2 on 22.09.2021. It is further asserted that accused No.2 has sold item No.1 of the suit schedule property in favour of the third party on 18.04.2023. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8814-DB C.C.C. No.1179/2023 3. We have perused the assertions made in the complaint and the counter. 4. The interim order granted by this Court is dated 26.09.2023, wherein, the parties are directed to maintain the status quo. In a suit, the petitioner is challenging the aforesaid gift deeds and also it is brought to our notice that now the purchaser is arrayed as a party in the suit. Taking note of the said assertion, we are of the considered view that the contempt petition is required to be closed without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, taking note of the fact that as on the date of granting of the interim order by this Court, the property was owned by the third party by virtue of sale deed dated 18.04.2023. The contempt proceedings are dropped, keeping all the contentions open to be urged in the pending writ petition and in the suit. 5. Notice issued to the accused shall stand discharged. 6. We place on record the appreciation to Smt.Archana K.M., Amicus Curiae who has represented accused No.1 in the above proceedings, for her valuable service to the Court. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8814-DB C.C.C. No.1179/2023 7. Copy of this order to be forwarded to the Amicus Curiae for reference. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE GH List No.: 3 Sl No.: 44