Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12978 (PNJ)

RYTHEMPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/4709/2026 · 2026-04-22

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-4709 IN THE (158) RYTHEMPR STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o official respon petitioners at t representation 2. At th that the petitio the Senior Sup their grievance been considere 4709-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH  D MPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Devi Lal, Advocate for the pe Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ****  HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fi tion of India seeking issuance of a w respondents No.2 and 3 to protect rs at the hands of respondents No.4 t tation dated 22.04.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned counsel fo petitioners have recently filed a repres Superintendent of Police, Fatehgarh evances as mentioned in the present pe nsidered and no action has been taken t NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH CRWP-4709-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.04.2026 THER ... Petitioners ...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA  the petitioners nior DAG, Punjab een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing the protect the life and liberty of the No.4 to 6 and to take action on their ure P-5). nsel for the petitioners has submitted representation on 22.04.2026 before ehgarh Sahib (Annexure P-4) raising sent petition but the same has not yet taken thereon. He further submitted  f the the the their itted efore ising t yet itted AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.23 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-4709 that at this sta are issued to r decide the af necessary actio 3. 4. notice on beha be done in du her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid repre within a perio accordance w petitioners, the order to protec  22.04.2026 Amit Sharma 4709-2026 (O&M) (2) his stage, the petitioners would be sat ed to respondent No.2-Superintendent the aforesaid representation filed b y action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior n behalf of the respondents-State and in due course. Let a complete set of ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer ma ting anything on the merits of the at this stage with a direction to r d representation dated 22.04.2026 (An period of 15 days from today, by nce with law. Needless to say, if rs, the official respondents would pro protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:    be satisfied if appropriate directions endent of Police, Fatehgarh Sahib to filed by the petitioners and take Senior DAG, Punjab, has advance te and submits that the needful will set of the paperbook be supplied to yer made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is on to respondent No.2 to decide the 26 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners y, by passing a speaking order in ay, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security in (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE  ned:- Yes/No   tions ib to take ance will ed to thout n is e the ners er in the ity in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.23 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.